Use case
Augmenting educators
Lecturers build their own tutorials, practicals and assessments with the Agent, and keep marking consistent across a team.
The problem
Building good practice material takes hours lecturers don't have. And when several people mark the same work, standards drift.
How it works
- 1
Describe what you need
Lecturers ask the Agent for a tutorial, practical or assessment, built from their own material.
- 2
Review and refine
They edit by chatting, and nothing reaches students until they publish.
- 3
Mark consistently
Evaluator tutors apply the same criteria to every proposal or report, so feedback is consistent across markers.
- 4
Reuse next year
Everything stays in the library, ready for the next cohort.
Built with
More use cases
- Gateway module support at scaleWeekly practice and feedback for large first-year modules
- The weekly learning loopSet up, complete, review the gaps, teach the gaps
- Modern assessmentPaper tests, marked against the memo in days
- Embedded tutoringTutors that answer from your own sources
- Student engagement and successLink student effort to better work
- From faculty pilot to operational rolloutStart with modules, then scale to the faculty
Which module would your educators point to first?
Start with one module and a baseline. We'll show you the change before you expand.